Hold on a second…didn’t have the luxury for her not to work?!
According to this news article,
in 2005, when their daughters were 7 and 4, Mr. Obama was making $162,100 a
year (in the U.S. Senate) and Michelle made $316,962. Their combined income at
that time was more than the Presidential salary of $400,000.
But they just couldn’t afford to live on a meager $162,100.
There was no help for it. Michelle wanted to stay home, but they just couldn’t
make ends meet that way.
Well, now we know – there’s no reasonable way for a family
of 4 to survive on $162k per year. Our most brilliant President thinks so. Those
of us who have somehow managed to do this must be truly incredible people. No
doubt we have horribly scarred our families by not being able to afford
multiple Hawaii vacations and country club memberships. How do we ever make it
without such basic necessities as caviar and designer clothing? We surely must
be living below the poverty level.
Now the sad story Obama tells of how terribly they struggled
and Michelle’s difficult time in balancing work and family is meant to show how
they can empathize with working class Americans. See, the Obamas are just like
us. They know how hard it is to struggle financially, to wonder how they will
ever afford the things they truly need. They want us to know they have felt our pain.
Nice try, Mr. President.
To those of us who have been able to live on one income
(often less than $40,000), who really do sacrifice to have a mom who stays at
home, this is laughable. The Obamas don’t understand that it’s not a matter of
how much you make. It’s not a question of luxury at all. It’s a priority we
make for the sake of our kids. And we also know that there is a big difference
between luxuries and necessities. The number of real necessities is far smaller
than the Obamas can grasp, apparently.
To those who really do lack the option to stay home, this is
an insult. The Obamas may have had their reasons for Michelle to work, but
lack of money wasn’t one of them. It wasn’t that they lacked the luxury for her to stay
home so much as that they wouldn’t have had enough luxury for their highbrow
lifestyle and tastes without Michelle’s considerable income.
This is just another example of how out of touch the first
family is with working class Americans. Now, it’s fine to make money and
there’s nothing wrong with being wealthy. I don’t have any problem with people
having well-paying jobs. If they can make 6-figure incomes, good for them. We
need them in the economy and that’s part of the American Dream – to be able to
better yourself and make more money through hard work. I don’t even argue if
they want to work instead of staying home with their kids. That’s their choice.
But when you make that kind of money, don’t try to tell me that you understand my
financial struggles or that staying home wasn’t an option for you. Don’t
belittle the sacrifices my family makes by pretending to have the same problems.
President Obama tries to curry the favor (and votes) of the
working class with his stories, but instead shows his total lack of
understanding of how ordinary people live. It’s no wonder his administration
has taken government spending to new levels of irresponsibility and given our
country the greatest debt it has ever seen. No wonder they so easily mortgage
our children’s future so that they can keep spending like there’s no tomorrow.
No wonder they can’t seem to get a balanced budget passed (or any budget at
all, for that matter). We have a man who doesn’t know how a family can possibly
survive on $162k in the White House.
Excellent! You're a terrific writer, and you captured thoughts shared by others. Blog on!
ReplyDeleteI sent this to Sean Hannity so if you get a call to go on the show don't be surprised. You are a amazing daughter....well you have always been that. Never a dull moment around you. Keep up the blogging. I am following your posts on my Kindle and RSS reader.
ReplyDeleteThanks Dad! I won't hold my breath though. LOL
DeleteMost politicians use this type of line to relate to the American people. It's not just Obama. And in reality, most members of Congress are much wealthier than Obama.
ReplyDeletehttp://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/as-americans-get-poorer-members-of-congress-get-richer/
I haven't heard any wealthy politicians pretending to be poor. Yes, they do try to "relate" to the American people (sometimes well, and other times not so well). But I haven't heard them saying they can't afford things. Mitt Romney, for example, has never said that his wife staying home with their kids was a financial hardship for them. I'm not a big fan of Romney, but at least he doesn't pretend to be what he isn't.
DeleteMy beef with Obama in this instance is not that he's wealthy. I really don't mind him (or anyone else) being wealthy. What I mind is outright lying and pretending that he's poor when he isn't. I also dislike his use of this pretension to further his political aims. The reason Obama doesn't just admit that he's wealthy is that he's made a career out of class warfare. He wants the poor to feel like he is one of them and will fight for them against the wealthy "fat cats." So he makes up just-so stories to prop up that image when, in reality, he has plenty of money and lives well. There's nothing wrong with having money and living well - except when you pretend all rich people are the enemy to get votes while living the good life.