Some say that cohabitation is practice for marriage, but
this does not hold up logically or observationally. Studies have shown that cohabiting couples are actually less likely to
marry than those who do not. Even if they do marry, they are more likely to have marriage problems and more likely to divorce.
This is simply a natural result because the nature of cohabitation is
dramatically different from that of marriage. In reality, cohabitation is the
antithesis of marriage.
Commitment is the very essence of marriage. Many types of
relationships contain elements in common with marriage, including
companionship, sharing of living space and/or finances, and sexual expression,
but only marriage is based on a lifetime commitment between a man and a woman. Because
cohabitation is not a committed relationship, it cannot be practice for
marriage. There is no way to practice making a commitment. You either make a
commitment or you do not. Because cohabitation includes many of the elements of
marriage without the essential one, it instead makes a mockery of marriage. It
is a cruel parody that places the supposed lovers in the position of exposing
themselves to each other without the supporting framework of commitment that a
sexually intimate relationship was meant to have.
Marriage is meant to be a lifetime commitment between a man
and a woman in which they physically, spiritually, and emotionally bond to
become one. This bonding of the entire self only works properly when all other
options are permanently rejected. It is the nature of erotic love to include
only two people. Each person has only one self and can only give that self
wholly to one other. In order to bind oneself so tightly to another, it is
necessary to forego binding in that way with any other at any time. Thus true
love requires commitment. Cohabitation is not a loving relationship because it
does not permanently exclude all others. When two people are cohabiting before marriage, they are putting
off commitment because they are waiting to see if anything better comes along. Cohabiting couples want to have their cake and
eat it too. They want sex and companionship now, but with the easy option to get out
when things get tough. A person who is “keeping their options open” is not
exhibiting love.
Marriage is designed to be a safe and loving environment for
the sharing of self. When two people commit to each other before sexual
intimacy, they affirm that their love for the other person is not contingent on
bedroom performance (or anything else). True love says “I love you, whatever
the cost may be, no matter what I may find out about you in the future, and
nothing you do will ever change that.” When two people who have remained
sexually pure commit to one another in marriage, they show the ultimate
expression of love. They commit to one another without reservation, without
exception clauses, without knowing everything, but having decided that whatever
they may learn will not induce them to reject the other person. It takes
courage and sacrifice to love like that. But anything less than full commitment
is not true love.
Conversely, cohabitation before marriage is not an environment that builds love and trust. Cohabitation, as a “trial period,” says to the other that they better measure up or else. It is an inherently selfish relationship that objectifies the other person. The emphasis in cohabitation is on getting what you want out of the relationship, which is the exact opposite of the emphasis in marriage, which is giving of yourself for the good of the other person. What is loving about taking pleasure in another’s body with the understanding that you may simply walk away if they don’t please you enough? Cohabiting couples end up evaluating each other’s merits rather than giving of themselves. Their relationship is based on scrutiny rather than acceptance. Such an environment is not likely to build a healthy and lasting relationship.
Conversely, cohabitation before marriage is not an environment that builds love and trust. Cohabitation, as a “trial period,” says to the other that they better measure up or else. It is an inherently selfish relationship that objectifies the other person. The emphasis in cohabitation is on getting what you want out of the relationship, which is the exact opposite of the emphasis in marriage, which is giving of yourself for the good of the other person. What is loving about taking pleasure in another’s body with the understanding that you may simply walk away if they don’t please you enough? Cohabiting couples end up evaluating each other’s merits rather than giving of themselves. Their relationship is based on scrutiny rather than acceptance. Such an environment is not likely to build a healthy and lasting relationship.
Cohabitation before marriage also takes the joy of discovery
out of the first part of marriage. The first few months of marriage are meant
to have a lot of surprises. The newlyweds should have fun finding out what the
other likes and how to please one another in an environment of mutual trust and
commitment. There should be an air of excitement as they try new things
together for the first time. Experiencing new and intimate things with the
other person under the umbrella of a marriage commitment takes much of the
performance pressure off and is crucial in building a strong and lasting bond
between them. It allows both partners to be themselves without fear of
rejection since the other person has already committed to them for life. On the
other hand, marriage between two people who have cohabited has no spark of
excitement, no thrill of discovery, nothing new to learn. The wedding, meant to
be a new beginning, becomes a mere formality. How is their wedding night
different from any other? She knows how he snores. He knows what her hair looks
like in the morning. They’ve already done it all. It’s just official now. Cohabitation
before marriage robs marriage of much of the excitement it was meant to have.
In so many ways, cohabitation is sorely lacking as an
alternative or precursor to marriage. It shows superficial similarities to
marriage, but on closer examination, they are dissimilar in every way that
matters. Cohabitation is not practice for marriage and does not build the type
of relationship that leads to a successful marriage. It is a cheap counterfeit
that should not be peddled as a valid step in building a strong relationship.
I really like your line that there is no practice for commitment, you either do it or you don't. Absolutely! I think cohabitation before marriage is kind of a weird idea in general just because statistics show it doesn't really work and yet people seem to swear by it. I just try to remember that just because my beliefs are what they are doesn't mean that everyone believes as I do, especially people who aren't Christians. I can't expect people who don't believe the way I do to act the way I do, you know? But we can always present facts and encourage kindly and I think you do a great job of that.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments Katie. You're right that we can't expect non-Christians to understand or agree with Biblical principles. The interesting thing is that the Christian worldview usually makes sense even without appealing to Christian morality. In other words, God tell us not to do certain things and when we study those bad behaviors, we find that they are really harmful to us anyway. His word and His design for our lives go hand in hand.
DeleteOh, this is the best treatise on marriage vs. cohabitation I have ever read! Bravo!!! And Amen to all of it. Thank you for sharing on NOBH!
ReplyDeleteThanks Diane! Thanks for stopping by.
DeleteUnfortunately, our society has really embraced the idea of free love. You've pointed out the many solid reasons why cohabiting is a bad idea and actually erodes the chance of a life-long and healthy marriage. Thanks for voicing an often controversial message, Lindsey, especially since it's one that needs to be voiced over and over until our society listens!
ReplyDeleteOur culture has done a very successful job of marketing cohabitation as a great thing, but you nailed it: It is a cheap counterfeit, indeed.
ReplyDeleteFantastic article on why living together before marriage just does not pay off!
ReplyDeleteAs a non-religious person I really appreciate this article. There is a lot of protection, security and freedom to be found in marriage that I don't believe you get with cohabitation. I was Christian at the time my husband and I dated and therefore we did not live together or have sex before marriage, and I still look at that as the best choice and don't "regret" it at all, even if my perspectives on a variety of other issues have changed.
ReplyDeleteI also want to say I really hope that this article simply speaks to people, and plants seeds, and they don't feel the need to come hate on you. Because some very provocative and inflammatory things were said and I just really hope you come out on the other side without your feelings hurt. People on the internet can be outrageous to say the least, I just know it's being shared already and I just urge you to stay strong and carry on.
Thank you.....my bf wants me to move in and doesn't quite get what I am trying to say ......that I don't believe in it for all the reasons you mentioned. He tells me that he wants me to move in because he's lonely and because he loves me also, but I believe, in my heart, that living together is unhealthy........it just doesn't feel right.
ReplyDeleteGood for you for sticking to what you believe. Don't give in.
DeleteTo your boyfriend, I say:
If you love her, really love her (not just wanting her body), you will not pressure her to do what she believes to be wrong. If you love her, you will not try to live with her before marriage because that puts your relationship at a much greater risk of falling apart. Doing what is wrong together will seem to bring you together temporarily, but in the end will only pull you apart. And, lastly, if you love her, you will wait for her and you will commit yourself to her for a lifetime in marriage before living with her. If you don't do these things, you don't really love her, and she is better off without you.